Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis Mili Note: Unfortunately, every distinction has two terms, every argument has a counter-argument, and consciousness can only focus on one of these at a time. In other words, the dialectical method involves the notion that the form of historical movement, process or progress, is the result of conflicting opposites. A thesis can be seen as a single idea.
A breakdown of a philosophical concept and why it matters to us. A dialectic, from the Greek: A dialectic is neither a debate nor a rhetorical argument but rather an intellectual dissertation with the intent to further our knowledge of the truth.
Truth through reasoning and logic, rather than fact. The dialectic method can be seen as an alternate approach to science, which is fact based, albeit empirical.
Science furthers our understanding of our reality through emperical data.
Data that can be reproduced and independently verified. Both dialectic and scientific methods seek the truth of the matter at hand and must be deemed valid for as long as they cannot be disproven.
For instance, we all know that our planet Earth revolves around the Sun and yet very few of us are able to establish and verify this as a fact. One of the very first persons who argued this to be a fact - Galileo Galilei - was put under house arrest for the rest of his life and up to this day there are still some who believe this heliocentric concept to be a lie.
What is true and what we perceive to be true, what is fact and what we perceive to be factual are not necessarily the same thing.
Truthfully, how many of our decisions are truly fact based and not a concoction of our hearts and minds? A mixture of logic reasoning and illogical feelings of sorts?
When we read the newspapers, browse the web or watch television what makes us believe the information involved? When do we decide in our minds to go with the story that is being presented to us?
Yes, the scientific method of fact finding and establishment of the truth is to be preferred at all times, and yet it cannot explain all occurrences in our reality.
In comes the Hegelian dialectic as alternate method to make sense of it all. He achieved wide renown in his day and although he remains a divisive figure, his canonical stature within Western philosophy is universally recognised.
Hegel has influenced many thinkers and writers whose positions widely vary. The philosophies of Marx and Nietzsche, phenomenology, existentialism and psychoanalysis - all had their beginnings in Hegel. So what are we make to of it all? Our life, the world we live in and the things happening therein?
Problem, Reaction, Solution The Hegelian dialectic is usually presented in a threefold manner. Thesis, the originating matter at hand, giving rise to a reaction, antithesis, which contradicts or negates the thesis, and the tension between the two being resolved by means of synthesis.
Or in more simplistic terms: When and wherever problems arise in our lives, in our world, these are followed up by reactions which eventually evolve and are resolved in solutions of sorts. This is key to whoever wants to understand and apply the dialectic reasoning. Keep that in mind.
The global warming issue conforms to the dialectic is all we can say from a dialectic point of view. Real life examples Are there any other matters that conform to the dialectic? This reasoning seems to conform to the dialectic. Communism is no longer a problem.
We have established new theses. The War on Terror and the War on Drugs are reactions to the perceived global threat of radicalised Islam and threats to public health.
If these are in concordance with the dialectic then where are they us leading to? What is their synthesis? Logic without regard for the actions involved or its consequences It seems to me that the Hegelian logic and reasoning is in effect regardless of the issues, the actions involved and its consequences.
There is no right or wrong. Or so it seems.What exactly is the Hegelian Dialectic? Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was a 19th century German philosopher who devised a particular dialectic, or, method of argument for resolving disagreements.
without realising it, is the thesis and the antithesis based off the Hegelian Dialectic. The only real debate that occurs is just the minor. The Hegelian dialectic is usually presented in a threefold manner. Thesis, the originating matter at hand, giving rise to a reaction, antithesis, which contradicts or negates the thesis, and the tension between the two being resolved by means of synthesis.
Or in more simplistic terms: problem, reaction, solution. For G.R.G. Mure, for instance, the section on Cognition fits neatly into a triadic, thesis-antithesis-synthesis account of dialectics because the whole section is itself the antithesis of the previous section of Hegel’s logic, the section on Life (Mure ).
The Hegelian Formula is typically expressed as follows: Thesis represents an idea or opinion, antithesis represents the counter-opinion or opposite idea, synthesis represents the domain where thesis and antithesis intersect and overlap.
The phrase, Thesis -Antithesis -Synthesis, forms an important tenet of Marxism, and is said to have been developed by the German philosopher Hegel. Thesis stands for a proposition or theory that is widely believed in. Antithesis is a negation of refutation of this theory.
The triad thesis, antithesis, synthesis is often used to describe the thought of German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.
Hegel stresses the paradoxical nature of consciousness; he knows that the mind wants to know the whole truth, but that it cannot think without drawing a distinction.